The Piltdown hoax was a hoax that occurred for over 40
years. The scientific community were outrage after learning the truth of the
remains that were found. Charles Darwin a scientist that presented evidence
that all living things descended from a common ancestry. Through a process of
mutation, adaptation, failure and success, he claimed that all life today
including man, is the result of millions of years of evolution. Charles Darwin
claim that humans and apes were related but failed to have provable scientific
evidence.
A fossil skull has
been found by a laborer at Basrkham Manor near the village of Piltdown and then
given to Charles Dawson who was an amateur archaeologist. Charles Dawson who
was a lawyer was interested in fossil hunting. He went out on search for
fossils. He was particular on what finds he was looking for. He wanted to find
spectacular discoveries, publicizing them and trying to build up an academic
credibility for his work. In Sussex he
discovered an old Pleistocene bed that he would find remains of an ape-like
jawbone with human-like teeth that seemed to link to the skull that Dawson got
from the laborer.
On December 18th, 1912 Sir Arthur Smith Woodward
and Charles Dawson presented the “Piltdown Man.” It was nicknamed the “earliest
Englishman.” The world was at awe that they had discovered the first ape-man
that proved Charles Darwin theory. Finally, a connection had been found and was
made world famous. In the scientific community however, questions started to
arise as experts had doubts about how human-like or ape-like this skull was.
The jaw was missing the place of articulation, it was broken off and the canine
tooth was absent as well but later was found. This made experts weary and ask
more questions but it wasn’t until 1953 that an announcement was made that the
Piltdown man was a fake.
It was horrifically embarrassing because people spent their
whole career looking at it and claiming it to be real. It was exposed finally
from within the museum, the Natural History Museum. The jaw was not human, it
was probably from an Orangutan, the teeth had been filed flat to disguise them.
The fossils were boiled and then carefully stained with chemicals to give them
an aged look. The canine tooth was crudely filed and colored with paint. It
remains a mystery as to who really did it.
During these times
scientist we’re believed to be scholars and gentlemen. No one could possibly do
something like this it wasn’t even a possibility but now you know this can
happen so they are alert to that possibility. I believe the human faults to be,
being judgmental. Allowing your ego to interfere with your work. This to me
negatively impacts the scientific process because it clouds your mind. You are
no longer taking a scientific approach but rather a personal one.
The positive aspects of the scientific process that were
responsible for revealing the skull to be fraud was measuring the Fluorine
content in the fossil remain they were able to tell how old it was. After further
testing of all the artifacts that were found were all fraud. If you remove the
human factor from science, then there would be no way for new things to be
discovered. Life lesson, do your research and don’t accept a fact without you
fully testing all possibilities’ take other people’s evidence for truth, always
ask questions and be spectacle.