Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Historical Influences on Darwin



Charles Lyell, a geologist, had the most influence over Darwin’s development of his theory of Natural selection. I believe this to be true because Lyell passion was in Geology and believed that the Earth’s surface were produced by physical, chemical, and biological processes through long periods of geological time. He wrote a book, “Principles of Geology” which placed him among the most recognizable leaders of his field. He was also great friends with Darwin. In 1859 the publication of “Darwin’s Origins of Species” gave new insight to Lyell’s work and which lead to the publication of “The Geological Evidence of the Antiquity of Man.” Lyell accepted evolution by natural selection. Charles Lyell forever changed the way the earth was viewed in the scientific community. His studies/ publications contributed to adding powerful arguments of his own to Darwin’s theory, which he later adopted Darwin’s conclusion. This was a big deal because of Lyell’s status in the scientific community. It was Lyell who demonstrated that forces such as wind, water erosion, local flooding, frost, decomposition of vegetables matter, volcanoes, earthquakes, and glacial movements had all contributed in the past to produce the geological landscape that we see today. He found through research that the earth was older than we thought. The concept of deep time was Lyell’s most significant contribution to the discovery of evolutionary principles because the immensity of geological time permitted the time depth for the slow process of evolutionary change. From the bullet points listed I believe the following help Darwin built upon the knowledge that this information provided. The points I believe to most directly affect Lyell’s work are; resources are limited, organisms with better access to resources will be more successful in their reproductive efforts and if the environment changes, the traits that are helpful or adaptive to that environment will be different. I choose these because Lyell demonstrated that natural forces through geological time change the earth and if the climates are slowly changing we evolve base on the environments. The strongest will survive and move on to reproduce. I believe that Darwin could not have developed his theory of natural selection without the influence and ideas of Charles Lyell because Lyell influenced Darwin’s work. He was Darwin’s mentor and looked up to him. He theories help better understand natural selection. The attitude of the church affected Darwin and his decision to publish his theory by believing that if these new ideas of evolution were generally accepted, the Church would crash, the moral fabric of society would be torn apart, and civilized man would return to savagery. Darwin believed his work to be controversial and his wife didn’t agree with his ideas because of her strong religious convictions. The evolutionary theory was also viewed as a threat.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Sir-Charles-Lyell-Baronet
 

3 comments:

  1. I also chose Charles Lyell as the most influential on Charles Darwin. It is so crucial to have his theory of deep time in order to support the theory of evolution. Many other scientist did in fact influence Darwin but this one, at least to me, does seem to be one of the most important and a very positive one at that. It is so fascinating that Darwin could have developed such a ground breaking theory and yet was so hesitant to publish it. Very different from today's standards. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. hi! i find your post very interesting. I think that Charles Lyell was a huge influnece on Darwin . I didnt even know that he was studying law first then moved on to geology, an interest turn of events because without his ideas about earth I dont think darwin would have develope Natrual selection! Its was tough for Darwin to push his ideas out in a very religous heavy culture but he ultimately did it in the end

    ReplyDelete
  3. One initial comment on format: Treat these posts as papers, with correct formatting and appropriate paragraphs. When a post is just one long paragraph, it can be very difficult for your readers (including the one grading your work) to parse out the different sections where you address particular prompts.

    Very good background on Lyell's work, particularly your coverage of how Lyell influenced Darwin and how he was in turn influenced in his own acceptance of evolutionary theory later in life by Darwin's work.

    While I understand your reasoning for your choice of bullet points, given that at this time Lyell didn't accept evolutionary theory, I'm not sure I see the connection. The points you list are more directly attributed to Malthus' work. Perhaps the point on the changing environment best applies? But aside from the bullet points, I suggest your comment on the concept of "deep time" actually describes Lyell's most important contribution to Darwin. Before Lyell, it was generally accepted that the earth was only a few thousand years old. Lyell demonstrated that the earth was at least millions of years old (we now know it is billions of years old). So how does that impact Darwin? Well, natural selection is a slow process. It would not have been possible for natural selection to produce not only the extant organisms in a few thousand years but also all of the extinct organisms. With Lyell's work, suddenly Darwin had the geological time he for his theory to work. Lyell, quite literally, gave Darwin the gift of time. Without that, Darwin's theory would not have worked.

    I agree with your conclusion regarding the importance of Lyell to Darwin. I don't often like to credit one particular scientist with so much influence over the work of another, but I'm willing to do that with Lyell (and Malthus as well), for multiple reasons. The parallels between uniformitarianism are remarkable and I'm willing to bet Darwin recognized those parallels. The issue of an "old earth" is absolutely crucial. Additionally, Lyell was a very good friend of Darwins and, in spite of his reservations on the concept of evolution, he was key to helping Darwin finally publish after the letter from Wallace revealed that Darwin was at risk of losing credit for his ideas.

    For the most part, I agree with your final section, except for the comment on his wife. Emma Darwin was indeed devout and Darwin was worried about how she would respond to his work. But before he published, she read his work and gave her approval. I don't think he would have published without it knowing the strength of her faith.

    ReplyDelete